get_schema async ¶

async def get_schema(
    self,
    policy_store_id: "capo_verifiedpermissions.types.policy_store_id.PolicyStoreId",
    *,
    config_overrides: Optional[AsyncVerifiedPermissionsClientConfig] = None,
) -> "capo_verifiedpermissions.types.get_schema_output.GetSchemaOutput":
    r"""<p>Retrieve the details for the specified schema in the specified policy store.</p>

            Args:
                policy_store_id: <p>Specifies the ID of the policy store that contains the schema.</p> <p>To specify a policy store, use its ID or alias name. When using an alias name, prefix it with <code>policy-store-alias/</code>. For example:</p> <ul> <li> <p>ID: <code>PSEXAMPLEabcdefg111111</code> </p> </li> <li> <p>Alias name: <code>policy-store-alias/example-policy-store</code> </p> </li> </ul> <p>To view aliases, use <a href="https://docs.aws.amazon.com/verifiedpermissions/latest/apireference/API_ListPolicyStoreAliases.html">ListPolicyStoreAliases</a>.</p>

            Raises:
                capo_verifiedpermissions.errors.access_denied_exception.AccessDeniedException: <p>You don't have sufficient access to perform this action.</p>
                capo_verifiedpermissions.errors.internal_server_exception.InternalServerException: <p>The request failed because of an internal error. Try your request again later</p>
                capo_verifiedpermissions.errors.throttling_exception.ThrottlingException: <p>The request failed because it exceeded a throttling quota.</p>
                capo_verifiedpermissions.errors.validation_exception.ValidationException: <p>The request failed because one or more input parameters don't satisfy their constraint requirements. The output is provided as a list of fields and a reason for each field that isn't valid.</p> <p>The possible reasons include the following:</p> <ul> <li> <p> <b>UnrecognizedEntityType</b> </p> <p>The policy includes an entity type that isn't found in the schema.</p> </li> <li> <p> <b>UnrecognizedActionId</b> </p> <p>The policy includes an action id that isn't found in the schema.</p> </li> <li> <p> <b>InvalidActionApplication</b> </p> <p>The policy includes an action that, according to the schema, doesn't support the specified principal and resource.</p> </li> <li> <p> <b>UnexpectedType</b> </p> <p>The policy included an operand that isn't a valid type for the specified operation.</p> </li> <li> <p> <b>IncompatibleTypes</b> </p> <p>The types of elements included in a <code>set</code>, or the types of expressions used in an <code>if...then...else</code> clause aren't compatible in this context.</p> </li> <li> <p> <b>MissingAttribute</b> </p> <p>The policy attempts to access a record or entity attribute that isn't specified in the schema. Test for the existence of the attribute first before attempting to access its value. For more information, see the <a href="https://docs.cedarpolicy.com/policies/syntax-operators.html#has-presence-of-attribute-test">has (presence of attribute test) operator</a> in the <i>Cedar Policy Language Guide</i>.</p> </li> <li> <p> <b>UnsafeOptionalAttributeAccess</b> </p> <p>The policy attempts to access a record or entity attribute that is optional and isn't guaranteed to be present. Test for the existence of the attribute first before attempting to access its value. For more information, see the <a href="https://docs.cedarpolicy.com/policies/syntax-operators.html#has-presence-of-attribute-test">has (presence of attribute test) operator</a> in the <i>Cedar Policy Language Guide</i>.</p> </li> <li> <p> <b>ImpossiblePolicy</b> </p> <p>Cedar has determined that a policy condition always evaluates to false. If the policy is always false, it can never apply to any query, and so it can never affect an authorization decision.</p> </li> <li> <p> <b>WrongNumberArguments</b> </p> <p>The policy references an extension type with the wrong number of arguments.</p> </li> <li> <p> <b>FunctionArgumentValidationError</b> </p> <p>Cedar couldn't parse the argument passed to an extension type. For example, a string that is to be parsed as an IPv4 address can contain only digits and the period character.</p> </li> </ul>
                capo_verifiedpermissions.errors.resource_not_found_exception.ResourceNotFoundException: <p>The request failed because it references a resource that doesn't exist.</p>
                capo_verifiedpermissions.errors.UnknownServiceError: The service returned an error code this client does not model.

            Examples:
                GetSchema
                The following example retrieves the current schema stored in the specified policy store.

    Note
    The JSON in the parameters of this operation are strings that can contain embedded quotation marks (") within the outermost quotation mark pair. This requires that you stringify the JSON object by preceding all embedded quotation marks with a backslash character ( \" ) and combining all lines into a single text line with no line breaks.

    Example strings might be displayed wrapped across multiple lines here for readability, but the operation requires the parameters be submitted as single line strings.

                >>> await client.get_schema(policy_store_id='C7v5xMplfFH3i3e4Jrzb1a')
    """

    async def _handler(
        req: "AsyncOperationRequest[capo_verifiedpermissions.types.get_schema_input.GetSchemaInput]",
    ) -> AsyncOperationResponse[
        "capo_verifiedpermissions.types.get_schema_output.GetSchemaOutput"
    ]:
        import capo_verifiedpermissions._operations.verified_permissions.get_schema

        (
            output,
            http_response,
        ) = await capo_verifiedpermissions._operations.verified_permissions.get_schema.async_get_schema(
            req.options, req.input
        )
        return AsyncOperationResponse(output=output, response=http_response)

    def _redact_output(
        output: "capo_verifiedpermissions.types.get_schema_output.GetSchemaOutput",
    ) -> dict[str, Any]:
        import capo_verifiedpermissions.types.get_schema_output

        return capo_verifiedpermissions.types.get_schema_output.redact_sensitive(
            output
        )

    interceptors_, options_ = self.operation_options(
        config_overrides,
        OperationLogging("GetSchema", redact_output=_redact_output),
    )
    input_: capo_verifiedpermissions.types.get_schema_input.GetSchemaInput = {
        "policy_store_id": policy_store_id
    }

    response = await aexecute_pipeline(
        AsyncOperationRequest(input=input_, options=options_),
        handler=_handler,
        interceptors=list(interceptors_),
    )
    await response.response.aclose()
    return response.output