untag_resource ¶

def untag_resource(
    self,
    resource_arn: "capo_verifiedpermissions.types.amazon_resource_name.AmazonResourceName",
    tag_keys: "capo_verifiedpermissions.types.tag_key_list.TagKeyList",
    *,
    config_overrides: Optional[VerifiedPermissionsClientConfig] = None,
) -> "capo_verifiedpermissions.types.untag_resource_output.UntagResourceOutput":
    """<p>Removes one or more tags from the specified Amazon Verified Permissions resource. In Verified Permissions, policy stores can be tagged.</p>

    Args:
        resource_arn: <p>The ARN of the resource from which you are removing tags.</p>
        tag_keys: <p>The list of tag keys to remove from the resource.</p>

    Raises:
        capo_verifiedpermissions.errors.access_denied_exception.AccessDeniedException: <p>You don't have sufficient access to perform this action.</p>
        capo_verifiedpermissions.errors.internal_server_exception.InternalServerException: <p>The request failed because of an internal error. Try your request again later</p>
        capo_verifiedpermissions.errors.throttling_exception.ThrottlingException: <p>The request failed because it exceeded a throttling quota.</p>
        capo_verifiedpermissions.errors.validation_exception.ValidationException: <p>The request failed because one or more input parameters don't satisfy their constraint requirements. The output is provided as a list of fields and a reason for each field that isn't valid.</p> <p>The possible reasons include the following:</p> <ul> <li> <p> <b>UnrecognizedEntityType</b> </p> <p>The policy includes an entity type that isn't found in the schema.</p> </li> <li> <p> <b>UnrecognizedActionId</b> </p> <p>The policy includes an action id that isn't found in the schema.</p> </li> <li> <p> <b>InvalidActionApplication</b> </p> <p>The policy includes an action that, according to the schema, doesn't support the specified principal and resource.</p> </li> <li> <p> <b>UnexpectedType</b> </p> <p>The policy included an operand that isn't a valid type for the specified operation.</p> </li> <li> <p> <b>IncompatibleTypes</b> </p> <p>The types of elements included in a <code>set</code>, or the types of expressions used in an <code>if...then...else</code> clause aren't compatible in this context.</p> </li> <li> <p> <b>MissingAttribute</b> </p> <p>The policy attempts to access a record or entity attribute that isn't specified in the schema. Test for the existence of the attribute first before attempting to access its value. For more information, see the <a href="https://docs.cedarpolicy.com/policies/syntax-operators.html#has-presence-of-attribute-test">has (presence of attribute test) operator</a> in the <i>Cedar Policy Language Guide</i>.</p> </li> <li> <p> <b>UnsafeOptionalAttributeAccess</b> </p> <p>The policy attempts to access a record or entity attribute that is optional and isn't guaranteed to be present. Test for the existence of the attribute first before attempting to access its value. For more information, see the <a href="https://docs.cedarpolicy.com/policies/syntax-operators.html#has-presence-of-attribute-test">has (presence of attribute test) operator</a> in the <i>Cedar Policy Language Guide</i>.</p> </li> <li> <p> <b>ImpossiblePolicy</b> </p> <p>Cedar has determined that a policy condition always evaluates to false. If the policy is always false, it can never apply to any query, and so it can never affect an authorization decision.</p> </li> <li> <p> <b>WrongNumberArguments</b> </p> <p>The policy references an extension type with the wrong number of arguments.</p> </li> <li> <p> <b>FunctionArgumentValidationError</b> </p> <p>Cedar couldn't parse the argument passed to an extension type. For example, a string that is to be parsed as an IPv4 address can contain only digits and the period character.</p> </li> </ul>
        capo_verifiedpermissions.errors.resource_not_found_exception.ResourceNotFoundException: <p>The request failed because it references a resource that doesn't exist.</p>
        capo_verifiedpermissions.errors.UnknownServiceError: The service returned an error code this client does not model.

    Examples:
        UntagResource
        The following example removes the listed tags from the resource.

        >>> client.untag_resource(resource_arn='C7v5xMplfFH3i3e4Jrzb1a', tag_keys=['key1', 'key2'])
    """

    def _handler(
        req: "OperationRequest[capo_verifiedpermissions.types.untag_resource_input.UntagResourceInput]",
    ) -> OperationResponse[
        "capo_verifiedpermissions.types.untag_resource_output.UntagResourceOutput"
    ]:
        import capo_verifiedpermissions._operations.verified_permissions.untag_resource

        output, http_response = (
            capo_verifiedpermissions._operations.verified_permissions.untag_resource.untag_resource(
                req.options, req.input
            )
        )
        return OperationResponse(output=output, response=http_response)

    interceptors_, options_ = self.operation_options(
        config_overrides, OperationLogging("UntagResource")
    )
    input_: capo_verifiedpermissions.types.untag_resource_input.UntagResourceInput = {
        "resource_arn": resource_arn,
        "tag_keys": tag_keys,
    }

    response = execute_pipeline(
        OperationRequest(input=input_, options=options_),
        handler=_handler,
        interceptors=list(interceptors_),
    )
    response.response.close()
    return response.output